Value vs. Growth, & the Russell Indices
If you've been reading my posts for more than one day, you've probably figured out that I lean more on the side of value investing and avoid growth investing like the plague. Well, the folks who put out all of the various Russell Indices statistics have a handy-dandy tool over at their website called the Russell Index Returns Calculator. This tool lets you specify which Indices you wish to analyze, and then allows you to output all of the annual historical returns into an Excel spreadsheet format.
I took all of the data for any Russell Index that had returns for 1994-2005 (that's as far back as this particular tabulation went on the Russell website), and compared the average annual returns for the various strategies over an 11-year period. You can view the results for yourself at :
Russell Index Comparison.
The conclusions are quite obvious. Out of the 6 total growth indices, 5 sit right near the bottom of the performance tabulation, and only one beat out any other value index! 6 out of the top 9 performing indices over the 11-year period analyzed were value indices.
Kind of makes those of us who still pay financial advisors want to sit back and scratch our heads and wonder, why pay someone like that over 1.0% or more in fees per year, when exchange traded funds like :
(DSV), (IJS), (IWD), (IWN), (IWS), (IWW), (JKL), (VBR), and (VTV), (in no particular order) can easiliy replicate the performance of the value indices mentioned above, and for fees that usually hover around only 0.3%!
On a side note, I just found out that The Million Dollar Portfolio was mentioned at The Daily Blog Watch with James Altucher at TheStreet.com, for the post The Davis Strategy, on the Davis Family investing book
The Davis Dynasty: 50 Years of Successful Investing on Wall Street
Thank you James Altucher!
Labels: Value Investing








